CineMundi

Middle East & Africa / Country index

Film and cinema culture in Ethiopia.

Film, criticism and cinema culture in Ethiopia.

1

Popular services

0

Domestic services

Leading recommendation service:IMDb(44)Letterboxd(4)Domestic service(22)Regional service(22)no data

ETEthiopia0 domestic services

Amharic films premiere in Addis Ababa cinemas first; piracy leaves almost no home-video market.

Informal channels: New Amharic films reach YouTube soon after their cinema run — the main way the diaspora watches them.

Ranking: editorial estimate · reviewed 25 Oct 2026 · Sources: Ethiopia's film industry plays catch-up to streaming (Shega, 2025)

The local cinema scene

For cinephiles

Production
No verified figure yet.

Archive, festivals and awards for this country have not been added yet.

01 / The directory

Sites people use in Ethiopia

Ordered by popularity.

  1. 1.
    IMDbUSRatings & recommendationsfilms · series

    Film and TV database with user ratings from 1 to 10 and the Top 250.

02 / Around the world

Countries & their film culture

Local voices. Global favourites.

North America

Latin America

Western Europe

Northern Europe

Central & Eastern Europe

Balkans

Middle East & Africa

Asia

Oceania

Highlighted names are the country's domestic services.

How to read ratings

The same number doesn't mean the same thing on every site. Only Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic have official thresholds; the rest are an editorial guide.

0–100%
Share of positive reviews — not how good a film is, but how many critics agreed it was fine.A film everyone rates 3/5 can score 100%.source: No Film School
  • 60%+ Fresh
  • 75%+ Certified Fresh (with a minimum number of reviews)
official
0–100
Weighted average of professional critics' scores.source: DiscussingFilm
  • 40+ mixed or average
  • 61+ generally favourable
  • 81+ universal acclaim
official
1–10
Weighted average of user ratings.The Top 250 starts at roughly 8.0; below 6 is poor.
  • 7.0+ good
  • 8.0+ excellent
editorial estimate
0.5–5 ★
Average of user ratings; the displayed score is algorithmically pulled toward the middle.Four stars is the most common individual rating.source: Study on Letterboxd rating adjustments (WebMedia)
  • 3.5+ good
  • 4.0+ excellent
editorial estimate
1–10
Average of user ratings — known to be stricter than IMDb.The same score means more here than on IMDb.source: Wikipedia: FilmAffinity
  • 6.5+ good
  • 7.5+ excellent
editorial estimate
0–100%
Average of user ratings (stars converted to a percentage).
  • 70%+ good
  • 80%+ excellent
editorial estimate
1–10
Average of user ratings.
  • 7.0+ good
  • 8.0+ excellent
editorial estimate
1–10
Average of user ratings.
  • 7.0+ good
  • 8.0+ excellent
editorial estimate
2–10
Users give 1–5 stars; the score is shown out of 10.source: Wikipedia: Douban
  • 7.5+ good
  • 8.5+ excellent
editorial estimate
0.1–5.0
Average of user star ratings out of 5.0, shown to one decimal.Scores are packed into the top of the scale, so small differences matter.source: Filmarks rankings explained (PR TIMES via animeanime.jp, 2025)
  • 3.7+ good
  • 4.0+ excellent
editorial estimate
0.5–5 ★
Average of user ratings.
  • 3.5+ good
  • 4.0+ excellent
editorial estimate
0.5–5 ★
Two separate scores: press (AlloCiné converts reviews from about 55 outlets to its own 5-star scale, shown from three reviews) and audience (users' 1–5 stars).Always check both — they often disagree.source: AlloCiné: how the press score works
  • 3.5+ good
  • 4.0+ excellent
editorial estimate
1–10
Average of user ratings.
  • 7.0+ good
  • 8.0+ excellent
editorial estimate
1–10
Weighted average of user ratings.Scores run high overall; below 7 is weak.
  • 7.5+ good
  • 8.5+ excellent
editorial estimate

Same film, different scores: Parasite (기생충, 2019)

Scores converted to a 0–100 scale · collected 25 Oct 2026

In this example Letterboxd is the highest and FilmAffinity and Kinopoisk the strictest. ≈ marks a value from an indirect or undated source. Not confirmed yet: Douban, Filmarks, Watcha Pedia.

Methodology

  • The ranking of services in each country is an editorial estimate (last reviewed 25 Oct 2026), checked every month against Chrome UX Report traffic data (Sep 2026). The “Top 1K” next to a site means it is among the 1,000 most visited sites in that country in Chrome. It measures the web only — apps are not counted — and sites inside a larger portal (BBC iPlayer, Naver) cannot be measured on their own. Where available, sources backing individual claims are listed with the country and the service.
  • Who leads = the first service on a country's list that is not streaming. “Domestic” means the service comes from that country; “regional” means it comes from a neighbouring country or the same language area (e.g. FilmAffinity in Latin America, Kinopoisk in Kazakhstan).
  • Film production shows only countries with a verified number (15 of 92). Countries count differently (produced, released in cinemas) and in different years, so the map compares orders of magnitude; the definition and source are listed with each country.
  • Local or global compares, by Chrome traffic rank, the most visited domestic film site (ratings, criticism, databases) with the most visited foreign one. Ranks come in steps (top 1,000, 5,000, 10,000…), so “as big as” means the same step. Streaming, where-to-watch sites and general forums are left out.
  • Domestic services counts the index's services from each country — a measure of the index's coverage, not of market size.
  • Links are checked automatically once a week; the first check has not been recorded yet.
  • Global streamers (Netflix, Prime Video, Disney+, Max) are left out because they are the same everywhere.
  • Informal channels — Telegram channels, hand-to-hand copies, YouTube uploads — are described but not linked. Everywhere, a growing share of recommendations also comes from TikTok and YouTube critics, which this index does not try to rank.